3
$\begingroup$

I apologize if this question is basic in some sense. I was looking for an example of a non-proper HNN-extension and I found this.

In the comments, markvs mentioned the Baumslag-Solitar group $B(2,3)$. We can show that this is non-Hopfian using Britton's lemma so that is not residually finite. So, its natural try to use this to get a non-proper example. We know also that $B(2,3)$ is an HNN-extension of $\Bbb{Z}$ with respect to the natural $f: \langle a^2 \rangle \to \langle a^3 \rangle$. Now, how to proceed now? I mean, there is a way to decompose $\widehat{B(2,3)}$ as an HNN-extension of $\widehat{\Bbb{Z}}$ or something?

Intuitively, makes sense to me to do $B(2,3) = \operatorname{HNN}(\Bbb{Z})$ then $\widehat{B(2,3)} = \operatorname{HNN}(\Bbb{\widehat{Z}})$, but I don't know if it works.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In general it is certainly NOT true that graph-of-groups decompositions of a group lead to corresponding decompositions of the profinite completion. For instance, there are amalgams of free groups $F_1*_M F_2$ without any finite quotients at all. (I think the first such example is due to Meenaxi Bhattacharjee.) $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Mar 24 at 13:12

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The largest residually finite quotient of $\mathrm{BS}(2,3)$ is the semidirect product $\mathbf{Z}\ltimes_{2/3}\mathbf{Z}[1/6]$.

So, if I'm correct, its profinite completion is $$\widehat{\mathbf{Z}}\ltimes_{2/3}\widehat{\mathbf{Z}[1/6]}.$$

Each time, the $2/3$ means that the generator $1$ acts by multiplication by $2/3$. Denoting by $P$ the set of primes, note that $\widehat{\mathbf{Z}}=\prod_{p\in P}\mathbf{Z}_p$ and $\widehat{\mathbf{Z}[1/6]}=\prod_{p\in P-\{2,3\}}\mathbf{Z}_p$. The group of automorphisms of the latter is also profinite, namely $\prod_{p\in P-\{2,3\}}\mathbf{Z}_p^\times$, so indeed the homomorphism $\mathbf{Z}\to \widehat{\mathbf{Z}[1/6]}^\times$ mapping $1$ to multiplication by $2/3$ extends uniquely to a continuous homomorphism $\widehat{\mathbf{Z}}\to \widehat{\mathbf{Z}[1/6]}^\times$.

A similar description should hold for all $\mathrm{BS}(m,n)$ whenever $\gcd(m,n)=1$. (Otherwise it's quite different since then the profinite completion is not solvable.)

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What role does the solvability of the profinite completion play here? $\endgroup$ Mar 24 at 10:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Carl-FredrikNybergBrodda in these cases we get an easy description of the profinite completion as semidirect product of two procyclic groups. (While in other cases, the profinite completion contains a nonabelian free subgroup.) $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Mar 24 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ OK, thanks, I suppose the part I don't quite see is why the profinite completion is not solvable in the case of $\operatorname{gcd}(m,n)=1$, i.e. (as you point out) where the non-abelian free subgroup comes from. $\endgroup$ Mar 24 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Carl-FredrikNybergBrodda if $p\ge 2$ divides both $m,n$, the Baumslag-Solitar group $\langle t,x:tx^m=x^nt\rangle$ admits as a quotient $\langle t,x:x^p=1\rangle$ which is the free product $\mathbf{Z}\ast (\mathbf{Z}/p\mathbf{Z})$, and is residually finite with a non-abelian free subgroup (of finite index). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Mar 24 at 13:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.